(DOWNLOAD) "Using Judicial Performance Evaluations to Supplement Inappropriate Voter Cues and Enhance Judicial Legitimacy (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)" by Missouri Law Review # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Using Judicial Performance Evaluations to Supplement Inappropriate Voter Cues and Enhance Judicial Legitimacy (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)

eBook details

Title: Using Judicial Performance Evaluations to Supplement Inappropriate Voter Cues and Enhance Judicial Legitimacy (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
Author : Missouri Law Review
Release Date : January 22, 2009
Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
Pages : * pages
Size : 387 KB

Description

I. INTRODUCTION Justice John Paul Stevens once noted that "[i]t is the confidence in the men and women who administer justice that is the true backbone of the rule of law." (1) This confidence gives legitimacy to courts at every level. But how is such confidence to be achieved and maintained? How do we instill trust and confidence in the judiciary in those members of the public with little knowledge of the court system or those who attain their knowledge from questionable sources? What kinds of information can be used to counterbalance the denigrating effect of judicial campaigns? This Article suggests that judicial performance evaluations, which meaningfully measure the traits that are essential to good judging, can serve to better inform the public of the role of the judiciary and to promote public trust and confidence in the courts.